07/04: The Hypocrisy Gospel: Get Rich for Jesus?
Category: Church
Posted by: RBAFounderX
How the religious right uses the 'prosperity gospel' to win foot soldiers and continue its culture war.
Researcher Sarah Posner has been following the Religious Right for several years and writes a blog called The FundamentaList for the American Prospect. Her new book, God's Profits: Faith, Fraud, and the Republican Crusade for Values Voters (PoliPointPress, 2008) examines the role advocates of the "prosperity gospel" play in the Religious Right.To read the rest of the article, click here.
Posner talked recently with Church & State about her research and the status of the Religious Right today.
Church & State: Many people think of the prosperity gospel as a movement that attempts to link Christianity to hypercapitalism and the collection of wealth. You assert these ministries play a political role as well. What role does the prosperity gospel play in the Religious Right?
Posner: When George H.W. Bush was preparing to run for president in 1988, his evangelical advisor, Doug Wead, prepared a list of 1,000 "targets" -- religious leaders of influence worth courting for the votes of their followers. The list included a lot of names you'd expect -- Robertson, Falwell, and other household names, but also included some of the most prominent prosperity gospel evangelists, notably Kenneth Copeland and Paul Crouch, the head of the Trinity Broadcasting Network. The courting of these prosperity televangelists by politicians continues today, as we have seen Mike Huckabee touting his close relationship with Copeland, and John Hagee and Rod Parsley campaigning with John McCain. In tune with the Religious Right, they take ultraconservative positions on issues like abortion, gay marriage, separation of church and state, and other social issues, and actively encourage their followers to vote.
In your new book, God's Profits, you discuss Ohio pastor Rod Parsley, who has labored to make an impact on statewide politics. Parsley's favored candidate for governor, Ken Blackwell, was soundly defeated in 2006. Does this mean Parsley has lost political influence? What are his goals, and what are the chances he could become a national figure as well-known as the late Jerry Falwell?
It's certainly Parsley's goal to be a successor to Falwell. He proudly accepted an honorary doctorate from Liberty University last year. (Parsley doesn't even have an undergraduate degree, so this was quite an honor, to say the least). He has said he sees his Center for Moral Clarity, the political arm of his church, as the successor to Falwell's Moral Majority.
Certainly many observers thought Parsley's influence was on the wane after Blackwell was trounced in the 2006 gubernatorial race. And although Blackwell's defeat could be chalked up to other factors -- particularly the raft of corruption scandals plaguing Ohio Republicans -- there was a group of prominent moderate Republicans who came out against Blackwell because of his religion-baiting.
That said, Parsley's name is still on the tips of conservative tongues as a religious kingmaker in the race for the White House, and McCain campaigned with Parsley, whom he called a "spiritual guide," in Ohio in March.
A spate of new books asserts that the Religious Right is a spent force politically. What is your view? Have we truly entered a "post-Religious Right" America?
Many kingmakers on the Religious Right have seen their political influence wax and wane. Pat Robertson and James Dobson, for example, do not wield the cult of personality that they once did. Yet while the movement appears rudderless at the moment, literalist conservative Christianity runs very deep in our country. Although the public face of the movement is in transition, and many centrist evangelicals are striving to spread a less divisive message, the Religious Right's basic doctrine continues to resonate with a significant segment of the population. Because of the movement's organization, any new leaders who emerge over the next few years will have a formidable and well-funded political and media infrastructure to build on.
The continued survival of the Religious Right depends on the cultivation of a new generation of activists. In your chapter titled "Generation Next," you discuss efforts by Religious Right leaders to raise up a new generation. How successful have these efforts been?


Doc wrote:
The denial factor even amongst those who term themselves 'Christian' is astonishing. It ought to be blazingly obvious, not considered to be a radical or fringe position, that killing an unborn baby is morally heinous. Christians everywhere should rise up and demand that this evil be put out from among us. Instead we find supposed 'born-again Christians' being willing to lend support to a politician who refused to vote against infanticide, let alone abortion (I refer, of course, to Obama's refusal to vote for the Born Alive act in Illinois).
O well, one can always take comfort in the fact that God is in charge. And He works thru means. One of the means thru which He often works is that sin, while not adequately punished on this earth, often results in earthly judgement to some extent. The influence of those who refuse to acknowledge abortion for the deep moral evil that it is will wane in the next generations. This is illustrated in my own family, a microcosm of society at large. I am the youngest of four sons of the last generation of ultra-liberals who would have such a large family (know any blazingly liberal folks these days who have more than 2 children? I didn't think so). It is common for ~ 75% of children to believe as their parents do, hence all 3 of my brothers are one stripe of liberal or other. I am the black sheep, being one of those dreaded right-wing conservative fundamentalist Christian Zionist neocon gun-lovers. My 3 brothers have 2 children amongst them all. Those 2 kids are adults now; I'll be surprised if either one of them has more than 2 kids, and it won't surprise me if neither has any. I have 4 myself. My oldest is in college and says eventually he'd like to have 6 kids. Who knows how many kids his sibs will have. Guess who's going to win the grandchild race? Guess who's religious, social, and political ideas will dominate in the next generation and beyond?
Just think of it as evolution in action. Survival of the fittest. Last man standing.